Colorado House Passes Hospital Cannabis Access Bill Despite Concerns

The Colorado House of Representatives has approved legislation allowing terminally ill patients to use medical marijuana in hospitals and other healthcare facilities, advancing a measure that patient advocates say was significantly weakened during the legislative process.

Sen. Kyle Mullica's bill cleared the House Health Committee weeks after passing the Senate with amendments that critics argue undermine the original intent of expanding patient access. The measure now heads back to the Senate for consideration of House changes.

"This is about dignity and compassion for patients in their final days," Mullica, a Democrat and registered nurse, said during floor debate. But patient advocacy groups have raised concerns that facility opt-out provisions added during Senate deliberations could leave many terminally ill Coloradans without access.

The Legislative Journey

The bill began as a straightforward expansion of medical marijuana rights for end-of-life care. Colorado legalized medical cannabis in 2000 and adult-use marijuana in 2012, yet healthcare facilities have largely prohibited patients from using their medicine on-site—even those with terminal diagnoses.

Mullica's original legislation would have required hospitals to allow medical marijuana use by patients with less than six months to live. But Senate amendments transformed mandatory compliance into voluntary participation, allowing individual facilities to establish their own policies.

The changes came after hospital associations lobbied against the mandate, citing federal funding concerns and potential conflicts with workplace drug policies. Several major Colorado health systems indicated they would opt out entirely if the bill passes in its current form.

What Patient Advocates Are Saying

Colorado cannabis patient advocates argue the amendments gut the bill's purpose. "We're talking about people who are dying," said one advocate who testified before the House committee. "They shouldn't have to choose between medical care and the medicine that helps them through their final days."

The concern centers on market concentration in Colorado healthcare. Three major health systems control roughly 70% of hospital beds along the Front Range. If those systems opt out, terminally ill patients in metro Denver would have few alternatives for inpatient care that permits medical marijuana use.

Rural areas face even starker choices, where single hospitals often serve entire counties. A facility opt-out in those communities would effectively nullify the law for local patients.

Federal Complications

Hospital administrators point to legitimate concerns about federal law. While 38 states have legalized medical marijuana, cannabis remains a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law. Healthcare facilities receiving Medicare or Medicaid funding—which includes virtually all hospitals—worry about jeopardizing those revenue streams.

"We're sympathetic to patient needs, but we can't risk federal action that would impact our ability to serve all patients," a Colorado Hospital Association representative told lawmakers.

Yet advocates note that other states have implemented similar policies without federal intervention. California, Maine, and New York all allow medical marijuana use in certain healthcare settings through varying frameworks. None have reported federal funding penalties.

The Numbers

Colorado's medical marijuana program currently serves approximately 78,000 registered patients, down from a peak of over 130,000 before adult-use legalization. Terminal illness accounts for roughly 12% of qualifying conditions under state law.

If the bill becomes law, even with opt-out provisions, it would affect an estimated 2,500 to 3,000 patients annually based on Colorado Department of Public Health data on end-of-life care utilization among medical marijuana cardholders.

What Happens Next

The legislation returns to the Senate, where Mullica must decide whether to accept House modifications or push for a conference committee to reconcile differences. The legislative session ends in early May, leaving limited time for negotiations.

Several patient advocacy organizations are urging Mullica to restore mandatory participation requirements, though the senator has indicated he believes the current version represents the best chance for passage. "Perfect shouldn't be the enemy of good," he said in a recent interview. "Some access is better than no access."

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis has not indicated whether he would sign the bill if it reaches his desk, though his administration has generally supported medical marijuana access expansion in previous sessions.

---

This article is based on original reporting by www.marijuanamoment.net.