USPTO Blocks Snoop Dogg's 'Smoke Weed Everyday' Trademark Application

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has rejected Snoop Dogg's attempt to trademark his iconic phrase "Smoke Weed Everyday," citing both federal marijuana prohibition and the slogan's ubiquity in popular culture.

Dr. ETC Holdco, LLC—the entity managing Snoop's intellectual property portfolio—filed the trademark application seeking exclusive rights to the phrase that's become synonymous with the rapper's brand. But USPTO examiners hit the application with a double rejection that highlights the ongoing complications of building cannabis brands under federal prohibition.

The first obstacle: marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law. USPTO's examining attorney determined that trademarking a phrase explicitly encouraging illegal drug use violates the Lanham Act's prohibition on immoral or scandalous marks. This isn't new territory—federal trademark officials have consistently blocked cannabis-related marks that reference consumption, though recent years have seen some flexibility for ancillary products and services.

But even if federal law changes, Snoop faces a second problem. The phrase has achieved what trademark lawyers call "widespread ornamental use"—it's everywhere. From t-shirts to memes to everyday slang, "Smoke Weed Everyday" has transcended its origins in Dr. Dre's 2001 track "The Next Episode" to become part of the cultural lexicon.

The Trademark Tightrope

The rejection underscores a persistent challenge for cannabis entrepreneurs and celebrities alike: building protectable brands in an industry where federal prohibition creates legal gray zones. While state-legal operators can secure trademarks for certain business names and logos, anything that explicitly references marijuana consumption remains off-limits at the federal level.

This creates an uneven playing field. Companies selling cannabis products can't trademark their most obvious branding elements, while mainstream corporations freely trademark everything from soft drink slogans to sneaker designs. The irony isn't lost on industry advocates who've watched Snoop build a cannabis empire worth hundreds of millions while being denied basic intellectual property protections.

Snoop's ventures include Casa Verde Capital, his cannabis-focused investment firm, and partnerships with multiple licensed operators. His Death Row Records acquisition and subsequent transformation into "the first major label in the metaverse" included NFT drops featuring—you guessed it—cannabis imagery and that same catchphrase.

What This Means for Cannabis Branding

The USPTO's position creates a strategic dilemma for cannabis brands. Go too explicit with marijuana references and risk rejection. Stay too generic and struggle to build distinctive market identity. The middle path—abstract imagery, coded language, wellness framing—has become the industry standard, though it often feels like speaking in euphemisms.

Some brands have found workarounds. Trademark applications for business names without direct drug references (think "Green Thumb Industries" rather than "Smoke Shop") generally sail through. Service marks for ancillary businesses—testing labs, compliance software, grow equipment—face fewer obstacles. But the core product? Still largely unprotectable at the federal level.

The denial also reflects how thoroughly Snoop's phrase has saturated popular culture. When a slogan appears on countless unauthorized products and in everyday conversation, it becomes nearly impossible to claim exclusive ownership. Trademark law requires marks to identify a specific source—and "Smoke Weed Everyday" now means everything and nothing.

The Path Forward

Dr. ETC Holdco could respond to the USPTO's objections, though the federal prohibition argument presents a nearly insurmountable barrier until Congress acts on rescheduling or legalization. The company might narrow the application's scope or argue the phrase has acquired distinctiveness specifically tied to Snoop's brand.

More likely, this rejection joins the growing pile of evidence that federal cannabis reform isn't just about banking access or tax equity—it's about basic business fundamentals like protecting intellectual property. Until the federal government reconciles its prohibition stance with state-legal markets, even the most famous cannabis entrepreneurs will keep hitting these bureaucratic walls.

For now, "Smoke Weed Everyday" remains what it's always been: everywhere and nowhere, owned by everyone and no one, a perfect symbol of cannabis culture's mainstream acceptance and continued legal limbo.

---

This article is based on original reporting by www.marijuanamoment.net.