Industry Pushes Back on THC Stigma as Wellness Debate Shifts

The cannabis wellness industry's obsession with THC percentages is missing the forest for the trees, according to a growing chorus of cultivation experts who say growing practices matter far more than cannabinoid profiles.

The debate centers on an increasingly common narrative in cannabis wellness circles: that high-THC products are problematic while low-THC, CBD-dominant products represent responsible consumption. But veteran growers and researchers argue this framing ignores fundamental questions about how cannabis is produced.

"We've created this false dichotomy where THC is the villain and CBD is the hero," said one industry observer. "Meanwhile, nobody's asking whether that flower was grown with synthetic pesticides or in living soil."

The Cannabinoid Tunnel Vision

The wellness sector's fixation on specific cannabinoid ratios has intensified over the past three years as CBD products flooded mainstream retail. Major brands routinely tout precise THC-to-CBD ratios, microdosing protocols, and "functional" formulations—all centered on cannabinoid content rather than source material quality.

This approach mirrors the early days of the organic food movement, when the industry focused on individual nutrients before shifting attention to growing practices. Cannabis appears to be following a similar trajectory, though the conversation has lagged behind consumer expectations in other agricultural sectors.

The emphasis on cannabinoid profiles has created perverse market incentives. Cultivators often prioritize hitting specific THC percentages to meet consumer demand or regulatory requirements, sometimes at the expense of sustainable growing practices or product safety. Testing labs report pressure to deliver results that match customer expectations rather than actual sample composition.

What's Actually in Your Weed

Cultivation methods dramatically impact final product quality in ways that standard cannabinoid testing doesn't capture. Pesticide residues, heavy metals, mold, and other contaminants can persist through processing—but these issues receive far less attention than whether a product contains 15% or 25% THC.

Several states have documented widespread testing failures and contamination issues even as products displayed compliant cannabinoid labels. A 2023 analysis of California cannabis products found that 15% of tested samples contained pesticide levels exceeding state limits, while Maryland regulators pulled dozens of products for failing microbial testing.

The disconnect has created opportunities for premium cultivators who emphasize growing practices over cannabinoid arms races. Craft cannabis brands increasingly market their sustainable farming methods, living soil practices, and pesticide-free cultivation—positioning these factors as primary differentiators rather than THC content.

Industry Response

Some cannabis companies are beginning to shift their messaging. Several California cultivators now lead with growing practices in their branding, relegating cannabinoid percentages to secondary status. Oregon's craft cannabis sector has particularly embraced this approach, with multiple brands achieving organic certification or transitioning to regenerative agriculture.

But the broader industry remains focused on cannabinoid content. Dispensary menus typically sort products by THC percentage, and many consumers still use potency as their primary purchasing criterion. Budtenders report constant customer requests for "the strongest stuff you have" regardless of other quality factors.

The regulatory environment reinforces this focus. Most state testing requirements mandate cannabinoid analysis but treat pesticide screening as optional or subject to random sampling. This creates a compliance framework that prioritizes measuring THC over ensuring product safety.

What Comes Next

The conversation around cultivation practices versus cannabinoid profiles is likely to intensify as the cannabis industry matures. Consumer expectations in other sectors—organic produce, craft beer, specialty coffee—suggest that source and process eventually matter more than simple potency metrics.

Several industry groups are developing cultivation certifications that emphasize growing practices, similar to organic or biodynamic labels in conventional agriculture. These programs remain nascent but could provide frameworks for shifting consumer attention toward production methods.

Whether the industry can move beyond its current cannabinoid obsession remains uncertain. But the parallel to other agricultural sectors suggests that quality-focused consumers will eventually demand more information about how their cannabis was grown—not just what percentage of THC it contains.

---

This article is based on original reporting by hightimes.com.